We do. At least, it seems that way. It's pricey, however, I reversed it on my Princess Mia's and it cost me 12,000 gold. Ouch!winstonz wrote:We need a list of all the official changes .
Does anyone know if we reverse the enhancements do we get all the rubies back?
1.6 Discussion
Re: 1.6 Discussion
Re: 1.6 Discussion
All my opponents seem to have gotten stronger since 1.6, and that's not just because my core cards have been nerfed.
I realised I cant reverse enhancements anyway because I'm not VIP
I realised I cant reverse enhancements anyway because I'm not VIP
Re: 1.6 Discussion
All rubies spent on one card are reimbursed at the expense of gold.
Im pretty happy with the new pack system. Bought about ten and got 4 diamond cards. 2 at once even. (still should have kept better data)
Prodigy mentioned a chance for legend and Epics but
I have yet to confirm. Even a slim chance would be great.
As long as its not zero.
Im keeping away from pro matches for now as wait time is too much a hassle
Im pretty happy with the new pack system. Bought about ten and got 4 diamond cards. 2 at once even. (still should have kept better data)
Prodigy mentioned a chance for legend and Epics but
I have yet to confirm. Even a slim chance would be great.
As long as its not zero.
Im keeping away from pro matches for now as wait time is too much a hassle
Re: 1.6 Discussion
Share the same sentiments with the ladder system. If all goes well, they will award the top 250 players instead of the top 25.Agreed. It was often hard enough finding a match before, now it is just frustrating. Tighten the standards when you have a ton of people playing. I do assume more people are playing the campaigns and afterwards will spend more time in the combat stuff, but according to chat, I've yet to see more than 20 people on at a time. That is not enough variety to get picky. And the ladder system? I haven't really seen it in action yet, but I get the feeling that the only people walking away with coins and diamonds will be the ones who need it least (e.g., the top 25 on the leaderboard). Am I wrong on this assumption?
My biggest question is... what is up with these two one-hour windows to play certain modes and amounts? I don't want to play a game to fit your schedule, I want games that fit my schedule! Is this for real, or will this go away in time (pun not intended)?
Loot battle Windows im assuming were an attempt to get players to fill up at certain periods in the day, not Unlike the supposed ladder. 5-15mins for one loot battle match (before) was not uncommon. Then only a few players were actually "lurking" it gets frustrating to keep coming across people i know i cant Beat. hahaha i can name a few but thats not the intent of this post.
I still have a lot of faith in this game and where it can go
If all goes well, we'll have thousands of players and pro matches and loot battles will be more frequent.
For now, I dont mind having tougher matchups and meeting my daily challenges in the 100 gold battles.
- PennFifteen
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:10 am
Re: 1.6 Discussion
Please Please PleaseTopdekx wrote:If all goes well, they will award the top 250 players instead of the top 25.
Have the ladder system reward a lot of people. Even if it is just something small to people 200+. Like mentioned, the top 25 dont really need much more. The fame and respect is what they are playing for.
I'll repost my thoughts from a previous thread about how I see the breakdown should go...
" Have it reset every 2, 3, 4, weeks. And give out prizes accordingly. I think a good way to do so is to say..
Top 5 players are in the 'Champions Tier' or w/e. At the end of the Ladder session/season these players get some really good rewards. 1 Epic card? A Few Legendaries? You're Legacy of The Gods Card Pack. 500 Diamonds? I don't know. But you know, something pretty legit for being in the Top 5 or so.
The next 20,25 players are in the 'Elite Tier'. They would get something pretty good, but not Champion Tier quality. Like say just a Dominating Card Pack (One that nets you Legendaries). Or 1,000 Rubies and 100 Diamonds. What ever you see fit.
Next 50 players are in... I dunno 'Challenger Tier'. They'd get 50 Diamonds and 1,000 Rubies? Maybe just Card Packs. Something reasonable.
Next 100 to get 10 diamonds + 1k gold? Smaller, yet a reward none the less.
Something along the lines of this makes sense to me. IF only the top 5 or 10 actually get something then a lot of people wouldn't really have a reason to try to progress in the Ladder, they would never compete. So it would just be the top 50 players actually playing it."
Giving away more should not hurt the game, it will only get more people involved and playing more!!!