Both have similar attack damage and both have the unique ability to target unarmored units.
Medusa deals an extra 50% damage but has magic attack type so deals 150%.
Frost Hunter has pierce attack so gets a 50% bonus also bc of his attack type.
So both do about the same damage however frost Hunter is a second faster and delays target by 6 seconds.
Medusa needs new ability she is just a weak frost Hunter that nobody uses.
Medusa vs Frost Hunter
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 9:44 am
- Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Re: Medusa vs Frost Hunter
Oh no no no you didnt Bookie!
You make a valid point but you forget an important factor here.
Medusa is only a 1 star card
Frost Hunter is a 3 star card
Its quite easy to aquire 3 Medusa cards vs 3 Frost Hunter cards
Thus giving new members with Medusa a good advantage from the start
and seasoned members an advantage with Frost Hunter when aquired.
If these cards are used..I see no need to change Medusa as a simple 1 star card.
You make a valid point but you forget an important factor here.
Medusa is only a 1 star card
Frost Hunter is a 3 star card
Its quite easy to aquire 3 Medusa cards vs 3 Frost Hunter cards
Thus giving new members with Medusa a good advantage from the start
and seasoned members an advantage with Frost Hunter when aquired.
If these cards are used..I see no need to change Medusa as a simple 1 star card.
Re: Medusa vs Frost Hunter
Ouch. Wimper. Ok I try to make this card more useful for free player long term.